UPSC Notes

Judicial Review and Suo Motu Cognizance

PYQs

8

Articles

1

Momentum

21

Phase IFoundation

Background

Overview

UPSC frequently asks about the role of the judiciary, its powers (like suo motu), and the balance between judicial activism and restraint in a democracy. Understanding these concepts is crucial for civil servants in upholding constitutional principles.

Judicial review is the power of the judiciary to examine the constitutionality of legislative enactments and executive orders of both the Central and State governments. Suo motu cognizance refers to the power of a court to take notice of a matter on its own initiative, without any formal petition or application, typically in cases of public interest or grave injustice.

Phase IIStatic core

Facts & tables

Key facts

Constitutional Basis

Implied by Articles 13, 32, 226, though not explicitly mentioned as 'judicial review'.

Purpose

To uphold the supremacy of the Constitution, protect fundamental rights, and ensure checks and balances.

Suo Motu Application

Often used by higher courts (SC and HCs) to address issues of public importance or human rights violations.

Judicial Restraint

A principle where the judiciary limits its own power, deferring to the legislative and executive branches, especially in policy matters.

Reference table

Static syllabus anchors

TypeReference
Conceptual areaJudiciary & Judicial Review
Conceptual areaSeparation of Powers & Constitutional Ideals

Reference table

Institutions & roles

BodyRole
Supreme Court of IndiaInterprets, adjudicates
High CourtsInterprets, adjudicates
Phase IIIExam lens

Prelims angle

Overview

Prelims angle: Statement-based questions

Prelims angle: Conceptual understanding

Quick revision

  • Judicial review: SC/HC power to examine constitutionality.
  • Suo motu: Court takes action on its own initiative.
  • Implied from Articles 13, 32, 226.
  • Debate: Judicial activism vs. restraint.
  • Ensures constitutional supremacy & rights protection.

High-confidence PYQs

Topic timeline

Judiciary & Judicial ReviewSeparation of Powers & Constitutional Ideals

‘Don’t waste our time’: CJI Kant declines to take cognisance of police violence during CJP’s Parliament march

22 Jul 2026 · The Supreme Court's decision to decline suo motu cognizance in a case of alleged police brutality highlights the ongoing debate regarding the extent of judicial intervention and the principle of judicial restraint, even when fundamental rights are potentially at stake.

Read article

Related topics

Current topic

Judicial Review and Suo Motu Cognizance

Practice writing on this topic

UPSC has asked 8 linked questions on Judicial Review and Suo Motu Cognizance in Mains. Write an answer to one — and get it evaluated.