UPSC Notes

Judicial Review and Protection of Fundamental Rights

PYQs

8

Articles

1

Momentum

21

Phase IFoundation

Background

Overview

UPSC frequently asks about the powers and functions of the judiciary, its role in safeguarding the Constitution, and its impact on governance and human rights. It is a cornerstone of India's democratic framework.

Judicial review is the power of the judiciary to examine the constitutionality of legislative enactments and executive orders of both the Central and State governments. In India, the Supreme Court and High Courts act as guardians of the Constitution and protectors of fundamental rights, ensuring that state actions do not infringe upon the liberties of citizens.

Phase IIStatic core

Facts & tables

Key facts

Writ Jurisdiction

Articles 32 and 226 empower the Supreme Court and High Courts, respectively, to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights.

Judicial Directives

The judiciary can direct investigations, order compensation, and ensure accountability of state actors for violations of rights.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL)

Public Interest Litigations (PILs) are a significant tool for individuals and groups to seek judicial intervention on matters of public importance, including human rights.

Rule of Law

The principle of 'rule of law' mandates that all state actions must be in accordance with the law, and the judiciary ensures this adherence.

Reference table

Static syllabus anchors

TypeReference
Conceptual areaIndian Polity & Governance
Conceptual areaFundamental Rights
Conceptual areaSeparation of Powers

Reference table

Institutions & roles

BodyRole
Delhi High CourtExercises judicial review
Phase IIIExam lens

Prelims angle

Overview

Prelims angle: Definition-based questions

Prelims angle: Institutional roles and functions

Quick revision

  • Judicial review: court power to check constitutionality.
  • SC/HCs: guardians of Constitution, fundamental rights.
  • Articles 32 & 226: writ jurisdiction for rights.
  • PILs: tool for public interest litigation.
  • Upholds Rule of Law, executive accountability.

Elimination traps

Constitutional vs statutoryDistinguishing between the constitutional powers of the Supreme Court/High Courts (e.g., writ jurisdiction) and the powers of statutory bodies (e.g., NHRC) in addressing grievances.

Check if created by Constitution or by Parliament.

High-confidence PYQs

Topic timeline

Indian Polity & GovernanceFundamental RightsSeparation of Powers
Prelims 2024· Definition-based questions, Institutional roles and functions

Three days since July 20 violence, Delhi Police, MHA yet to acknowledge police excesses

24 Jul 2026 · Judicial review allows courts to scrutinize state actions for constitutionality and legality. Constitutional courts (SC, HCs) protect fundamental rights via writs (Art 32, 226) and PILs, ensuring executive accountability and upholding the rule of law.

Read article

Related topics

Practice writing on this topic

UPSC has asked 8 linked questions on Judicial Review and Protection of Fundamental Rights in Mains. Write an answer to one — and get it evaluated.